Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 24, 2026, 03:56:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[June 23, 2026, 08:46:25 PM]

[June 23, 2026, 02:17:12 PM]

[June 23, 2026, 12:33:53 PM]

[June 23, 2026, 10:29:32 AM]

[June 23, 2026, 09:50:57 AM]

[June 22, 2026, 08:57:58 PM]

[June 22, 2026, 04:58:29 PM]

[June 22, 2026, 09:42:48 AM]

by Clb
[June 22, 2026, 08:32:50 AM]

[June 21, 2026, 09:37:27 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 05:01:05 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 04:12:35 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 03:18:06 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 09:14:42 AM]

[June 19, 2026, 09:49:48 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 09:24:12 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 07:49:09 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 07:05:08 AM]

[June 18, 2026, 06:59:04 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 05:48:32 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 10:20:30 AM]

[June 17, 2026, 09:17:11 PM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Topic: chinook versus coho  (Read 6704 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13201
Same fish, different pose.  Still think nookie?

-Allen


crash

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Location: Eureka
  • Date Registered: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 6601
I think this is a trick question.  Almost looks like a bright blueback/sockeye.
"SCIENCE SUCKS" - bmb


Sailfish

  • Manatee
  • *****
  • .
  • Location: Prunetucky
  • Date Registered: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 27710
Wow...From the look of the cheek & lower jaw...it looks like a Coho in this picture.  Can we see the tail?  :smt003
"Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass...it's about learning how to dance in the rain."


polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13201
Arrgghh ... you guys better just stick to gumline/tail.   :smt002

Sorry Sonny, no tail shot for you.

-Allen


dilbeck

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Location: San Jose
  • Date Registered: May 2006
  • Posts: 5861
I was going to say Coho but in the initial picture I thought it looked much larger that what I understood them to get.  It looks a little smaller in the second picture and confirms my hypotheses.

Michael



ravensblack

  • Manatee
  • *****
  • Location: petaluma
  • Date Registered: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 11014
In the 1st photo I think I am seeing a purple reddish haze on the back . Is it the lighting that is doing that? In the second pic the green is standing out more. Especially on the head and forward part of the back. There are small kings too Dilbeck called jack slamon. I cant see the adfipose fin in either shot. Come on Allen. What gives buddy? :smt006
"I always entertain great hope" Robert Frost


SlayRide

  • Sand Dab
  • **
  • Location: La Jolla, CA
  • Date Registered: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 63
After catching a few, it becomes second nature, and you don't even need to look at the gumline or tail.  Quick test ... what is this?

-Allen


In the open ocean, I'd have to respectfully disagree, at least sometimes. I feel like I've seen my share and I always confirm with the color between the teeth (gumline) of the lower jaw. Yes, many fish are immediately obvious but there are a lot of variations in looks when the fish are chromers. I don't think it's great advice to be nonchalant about the ID just because you're an accomplished salmon angler. Coho, in CA at least, are in real trouble and we need to be responsible anglers by correctly IDing and handling fish.

How come everybody is afraid to guess? Pictures can be tough especially when the location and certain features are being hidden :smt098 but I'm voting coho. I'd be hard pressed to accept this to be a Chinook without further evidence.
Be the guide.


polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13201
After catching a few, it becomes second nature, and you don't even need to look at the gumline or tail.  Quick test ... what is this?

-Allen


In the open ocean, I'd have to respectfully disagree, at least sometimes. I feel like I've seen my share and I always confirm with the color between the teeth (gumline) of the lower jaw.

Respectful disagreement noted.   :smt001  I always know when I get a good shot at them in the water (live, not in pictures).  But like you, I still check the gumline.  I can't remember the last time I was wrong.

-Allen


polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13201
In the 1st photo I think I am seeing a purple reddish haze on the back . Is it the lighting that is doing that? In the second pic the green is standing out more. Especially on the head and forward part of the back. There are small kings too Dilbeck called jack slamon. I cant see the adfipose fin in either shot. Come on Allen. What gives buddy? :smt006

It was late in the evening so there was some "brilliant" lighting.  You can see that in the light reflections off the water in the upper part of the pic.  This one is a coho.  And a fatty at that.  I conservatively estimated 12 pounds.

Did nobody read my report?  http://www.norcalkayakanglers.com/index.php/topic,20176.0.html

This pic and an ID of it being a coho were right there.  Hah!

-Allen


otobepelagic

  • o2b
  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
  • Location: cotati
  • Date Registered: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 3680
Allen/PolePole, I read your report so I disqualified myself  :smt002. Outstanding report and pictures.

 When the ocean salmon season was open here locally you knew (most of the time) you had a "silver" ....those things can fly and hate coming to the boat.
NCKA Angler of the Year 2010 1st Place, 2009 2nd Place, 2008 3rd Place          


Living the dream before I can only dream of it.......


dilbeck

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Location: San Jose
  • Date Registered: May 2006
  • Posts: 5861
There are small kings too Dilbeck called jack slamon.

True, although it could be a Jennie Salmon also.

I guess I just thought of Jacks as being 4, 5, or 6 lbs. or something around there, not 10-15 lbs.  Learn something new everyday.

Michael



Sin Coast

  • AOTY committee
  • Global Moderator
  • Pat Kuhl
  • Turf Image
  • Location: Mbay
  • Date Registered: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 14710
Those silvers were so thick in MoBay 5 years ago! It was like a 2-1 hookup ratio. And after catching/fighting a few, you can practically ID it before getting color.
IMO its easier to ID them based on the fight moreso than from a random photo.

BTW nice fish Allen! Epic report & beautiful pics too.
Photobucket Sucks!

 Team A-Hulls

~old enough to know better, young enough to not care~


polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13201
Chinook have a particular smell to them too.  Moreso when they are immature.  Sort of a metallic smell.  Anyone know what I'm talking about?

-Allen


Sailfish

  • Manatee
  • *****
  • .
  • Location: Prunetucky
  • Date Registered: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 27710
Chinook have a particular smell to them too.  Moreso when they are immature.  Sort of a metallic smell.  Anyone know what I'm talking about?
-Allen

Nope, They all smell fishy and delicious to me  :smt044
"Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass...it's about learning how to dance in the rain."


jonesz

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Location: Sebastopol
  • Date Registered: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 2933
It's also lacking the back spots you see on the kings.