Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 13, 2026, 07:07:07 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[Today at 06:54:41 PM]

by Clb
[Today at 09:14:31 AM]

[Today at 08:44:26 AM]

[Today at 07:48:55 AM]

[Today at 05:31:14 AM]

[Today at 01:12:16 AM]

[June 12, 2026, 07:09:07 PM]

[June 12, 2026, 05:42:51 PM]

[June 12, 2026, 12:37:56 PM]

[June 11, 2026, 10:42:51 PM]

[June 10, 2026, 04:02:40 PM]

[June 09, 2026, 11:58:37 AM]

[June 08, 2026, 10:42:37 PM]

[June 08, 2026, 03:41:12 PM]

[June 08, 2026, 09:05:29 AM]

[June 08, 2026, 06:35:36 AM]

[June 07, 2026, 08:49:06 PM]

[June 07, 2026, 07:40:24 PM]

[June 07, 2026, 08:30:07 AM]

[June 07, 2026, 06:14:14 AM]

[June 06, 2026, 06:02:16 PM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Topic: Deep Fried - Beer?  (Read 3774 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

&

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Date Registered: Mar 2005
  • Posts: 6636
Quote
... a patent for the process is pending. He declined to say whether any special ingredients were involved.

Odd statement.  A patent app must include a specification such that one of ordinary skill in the art could make or use the invention.  That requires disclosing the so-called "best mode" of the invention.  In other words, he had a duty to disclose to the USPTO the use of any "special ingredients."  If he is withholding preferred embodiments, he cannot obtain a patent, or the one that issues will ultimately be invalid and unenforceable.  Its either bs about the patent app, or he submitted a lame-ass provisional app which cannot be the basis for an enforceable utility app.

So yeah, Tote, it probably is part joke.  (Although, to paraphrase the Supreme Court, you "can patent anything under the sun, made by man", including cooking techniques)


redwoodfox

  • Guest


 

anything