Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 24, 2026, 06:54:14 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[June 23, 2026, 08:46:25 PM]

[June 23, 2026, 02:17:12 PM]

[June 23, 2026, 12:33:53 PM]

[June 23, 2026, 10:29:32 AM]

[June 23, 2026, 09:50:57 AM]

[June 22, 2026, 08:57:58 PM]

[June 22, 2026, 04:58:29 PM]

[June 22, 2026, 09:42:48 AM]

by Clb
[June 22, 2026, 08:32:50 AM]

[June 21, 2026, 09:37:27 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 05:01:05 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 04:12:35 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 03:18:06 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 09:14:42 AM]

[June 19, 2026, 09:49:48 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 09:24:12 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 07:49:09 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 07:05:08 AM]

[June 18, 2026, 06:59:04 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 05:48:32 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 10:20:30 AM]

[June 17, 2026, 09:17:11 PM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Topic: Removing a dam on Carmel River  (Read 1172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sin Coast

  • AOTY committee
  • Global Moderator
  • Pat Kuhl
  • Turf Image
  • Location: Mbay
  • Date Registered: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 14710
Recent article that ran in the Monterey Herald. Sounds like good news for once!
PK



San Clemente Dam to come down
Cal Am revives $84 million project to demolish structure
By DANIEL LOPEZ
Herald Staff Writer
Updated: 11/14/2009 01:26:59 AM PST

California American Water says it will try to tear down San Clemente Dam on the Carmel River after all.

Plans to demolish the aging 106-foot-tall dam came to a halt in February because of a disagreement over project liability and a freeze in state funding.

But Cal Am, which owns the dam, announced Friday that with the help of the California Coastal Conservancy and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, plans to remove the dam are back on.

"The project will resolve earthquake and flood safety issues associated with the dam while benefiting the wildlife that depend on the river," Cal Am President Robert MacLean said in a news release.

San Clemente Dam was built in 1921 to hold 2,000 acre-feet of water. The reservoir has filled with about 2.5million cubic yards of sediment over the years and now holds only about 125 acre-feet of water.

In the early 1990s, the state's Department of Water Resources Division of Dam Safety declared the structure unsafe. Officials say the dam could collapse in the event of a magnitude-5.5 earthquake on the Tularcitos Fault, which the dam straddles, or in a magnitude-7 or greater earthquake on the San Andreas Fault.

An environmental impact report issued in 2007 by the Department of Water Resources and the Army Corps of Engineers evaluated five options to bring the dam into compliance with current standards.

The options included reinforcing the dam by buttressing it with added concrete or removing it, with the
Advertisement
Quantcast
Carmel River being rerouted through San Clemente Creek to bypass the accumulated sediment.

Environmental groups have favored demolishing the dam because that would provide the greatest benefit to wildlife and the river ecosystem.

Cal Am and the Coastal Conservancy were working together to demolish the dam until negotiations dissolved earlier this year because no one wanted to assume liability for problems that could arise as a result of the project. Matters were further complicated by the state's budget crisis. Cal Am said it would buttress the dam instead.

Demolishing the dam would cost about $84million and the Coastal Conservancy would contribute $34million, but its money was tied up by the state.

Cal Am's announcement of the revived plans came late Friday, and officials at the Coastal Conservancy could not be reached for comment.

Catherine Bowie, spokeswoman for the water company, said its project partner plans to apply for state and federal grants and to seek other funding sources to pay for the demolition.

Cal Am would pay $50million of the total cost and deed 928 acres around the dam as parkland. Bowie said they are trying to identify an agency that would be willing to assume responsibility for that land.

Project liability remains an issue, "but with the help of environmental groups and elected representatives on the local, state and national level, whose support for the removal project is nearly unanimous, we are hopeful the liability issues can be resolved," MacLean said.

Bowie said Cal Am will try to recover its share of the project cost from ratepayers. The company's share is based on what it would cost to reinforce the dam.

Jonas Minton, water policy adviser for the Planning and Conservation League, said the joint effort of Cal Am and the Coastal Conservancy to remove the dam is a cost-effective solution.

"This will minimize rate impact to the water users and lead to the restoration of an incredible ecosystem in the heart of the Monterey region," he said.

Bowie said initial construction for dam removal could begin in September 2013, with the project completed by January 2016.

Demolition will require approval of the Public Utilities Commission.

Daniel Lopez can be reached at 646-4494 or [email protected].
Photobucket Sucks!

 Team A-Hulls

~old enough to know better, young enough to not care~


LoletaEric

  • Gimme Shelter Annual Kayakfishing Tournament Director
  • Manatee
  • *****
  • The focus is achieving a state of mind.
  • LoletaEric.com
  • Location: Humboldt - Always OTW if there is an option.
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 19946
Excellent news for the river and its wildlife, and more steelies for you to chase, PK.   :smt001
I am a licensed guide.  DFW Guide ID:  1000124.   Let's do a trip together.

Loleta Eric's Guide Service

[email protected] - call me up at (707) 845-0400

http://www.loletaeric.com

Being an honorable sportsman is way more important than what you catch.


Squidder K

  • On the 7th day God created fishing!
  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Old Squidder's never die!
  • Location: Bremerton, WA
  • Date Registered: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 3574
84 million dollars?  I think I know a Engineer unit that would love practicing blowing the dam up for pennies on the dollar.  Some C-4 and let mother nature do the rest.  $84 million is a lot of tax payer bucks to spend on that, where is prison labor when you need it?  Do this in the south and see chain gangs come out. 
Kevin Storm
"A bad day fishing, still beats a good day of work!"
Stealth Fisha 555 aka the "Triple Nickel"
Hobie Mirage 1st Gen (Great for knee replacement therapy)
Hobie Quest (Gone)
Necky Kyook (I wished I had kept it)

Hero's on the Water
Veteran 36th Infantry Division "The Fighting Texans"
Patriots Fan since 1967
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=field+artillery+song


Aaron

  • Salmon
  • ***
  • Love and respect the great blue world.
  • Location: Monterey Bay
  • Date Registered: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 718
It's about time! Hopefully there are enough wild steelies left after the dust settles to rebuild a sustainable population in the Carmel.This watershed is hurting.
Manager Monterey Bay Kayaks Moss Landing
ACA Certified Instructor,Kayak Tour Guide


e2g

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • 53 lb seabass
  • Location: Aptos
  • Date Registered: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3032
any idea what all that sediment will do as it is suddenly released into the system?  Seems like it would choke out just about everything.
Winner 2011 MBK Derby
Winner 2009 Fishermans Warehouse Santa Cruz Tournament
Winner 2008 MBK Derby


Sin Coast

  • AOTY committee
  • Global Moderator
  • Pat Kuhl
  • Turf Image
  • Location: Mbay
  • Date Registered: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 14710
That's one of the main issues. I believe they plan to remove all of the sediment prior to demo'ing the dam.
Photobucket Sucks!

 Team A-Hulls

~old enough to know better, young enough to not care~


Bird

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Location: Rancho Cordova, CA
  • Date Registered: May 2006
  • Posts: 3569
Interesting story PK, hope it is successful. Keep us posted on how the process moves forward.


mbhalihunter

  • Sand Dab
  • **
  • Location: Monterey
  • Date Registered: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 22
They are actually going to leave most of the sediment in place.  There is a small tribuatary that enters the lake near where the main stem does and there is a small hill between the two.  The small hill will be removed and cut so that the main stem can flow into the tributary arm of the lake which isn't full of sediment.  The rocks from the hill will be used to build a dam for the sediment in the main stem near where the cut will be.  The rock and debris from the dam will be used to hold up the sediment for the downstream. 

This is a really ambitious program that would benefit people and fish. 

Here is the website for the project:

http://www.scc.ca.gov/disp_gen.file?san_clemente