Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 19, 2026, 09:22:16 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[Today at 08:10:22 PM]

[Today at 07:49:09 PM]

[Today at 07:47:25 PM]

[Today at 07:44:54 PM]

[Today at 04:40:10 PM]

[Today at 08:42:23 AM]

[Today at 07:05:08 AM]

[Today at 05:02:11 AM]

[June 18, 2026, 06:59:04 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 05:48:32 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 10:20:30 AM]

[June 17, 2026, 09:17:11 PM]

[June 16, 2026, 07:32:39 PM]

[June 16, 2026, 07:28:28 PM]

[June 16, 2026, 04:56:55 PM]

[June 16, 2026, 03:38:12 PM]

[June 16, 2026, 02:34:57 PM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Topic: bad ship don't do that no more  (Read 1556 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

HobieSport

  • Salmon
  • ***
  • Let us go fishing together
  • Location: Mendocino, Calif
  • Date Registered: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 577
Here's a link to a good very complete article about the spill, one week after the accident, from the SF Chronicle.  What struck me most here is that with all the modern electronics on board (but radar possibly on the fritz) the only reason the ship may have not crashed head on to the pylon was because the lookout on the bow saw them heading straight towards the pylon and he yelled and rang an alarm bell.   Hard to even imagine what may have happened if the ship had hit head on!

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/11/14/MNC5TBQ9R.DTL

-Matt
« Last Edit: November 14, 2007, 09:28:54 AM by HobieSport »