Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 23, 2026, 05:14:30 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[July 22, 2026, 10:45:27 PM]

[July 22, 2026, 08:47:35 PM]

[July 22, 2026, 08:47:08 PM]

[July 22, 2026, 08:40:52 PM]

[July 22, 2026, 09:47:14 AM]

[July 21, 2026, 12:20:16 PM]

by Nawm
[July 21, 2026, 10:13:15 AM]

[July 21, 2026, 10:00:18 AM]

[July 20, 2026, 03:21:05 PM]

[July 20, 2026, 11:15:22 AM]

[July 19, 2026, 11:23:29 AM]

[July 18, 2026, 12:20:34 PM]

[July 18, 2026, 11:30:33 AM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Topic: All this rain, but Lake San Antonio still only at 17%??  (Read 577 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AlsHobieOutback

  • - = Proud Member of Team A-HULLS! = -
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • "I love it when a plan comes together!"
  • Location: "In the Redwoods!" AKA: Boulder Creek, CA
  • Date Registered: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 14811
Poor Lake San Antonio still isn't filling up with all this rain.  I know Lexington and Anderson were spilling over last week, but the Monterey lakes are still in serious need:

http://www.mcwra.co.monterey.ca.us/reservoir_data/documents/ReservoirData.pdf

"A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for."

 IG: alshobie


Sin Coast

  • AOTY committee
  • Global Moderator
  • Pat Kuhl
  • Turf Image
  • Location: Mbay
  • Date Registered: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 14715
It's gone up 33ft though. I've been monitoring the upper San Antonio river gage online and there has been a lot of water flowing into the lake.
It dipped below 6% capacity in October 2013 and has remained below 8% until 2wks ago.
The plan was to reopen in May. But maybe sooner if we keep getting rain!
« Last Edit: January 19, 2017, 10:14:33 PM by Cen Coast »
Photobucket Sucks!

 Team A-Hulls

~old enough to know better, young enough to not care~


dilbeck

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Location: San Jose
  • Date Registered: May 2006
  • Posts: 5861
You guys think the stripers survived?



Sin Coast

  • AOTY committee
  • Global Moderator
  • Pat Kuhl
  • Turf Image
  • Location: Mbay
  • Date Registered: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 14715
Uhh, yes  :smt002  Although, with the low water, they were easier to target and almost everybody kept their fish (plus, limit is 10 there). So I fear that we did a lot of damage to the fishery.
Photobucket Sucks!

 Team A-Hulls

~old enough to know better, young enough to not care~


Fish Master1

  • If it bleeds I can kill it.
  • Manatee
  • *****
  • A-Hull Muggle
  • Location: Prunedale California
  • Date Registered: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 10108
From what I understand they are realesing water? And yes some fish survived until this day. :smt044
..........Sincerly A-Hull Muggle.


 

anything