I'll have the salmon and a side of radiation

Have you seen this

That's the tsunami propagation map and has nothing to do with the radiation leak that came days/weeks/months/years later.

Totally disingenous and fake article.

Thats what I figured to but still it pays to keep an eye on it
Oddly 2 weeks ago I was at a party and talked to a nuclear engineer
And she was telling me that all the waste from the Japanese plants would have zero affect on the ocean
I was equally  skepticalof such a blanket statement when japans plan so far has been putting the east water in tanks and more tanks and more tanks

Have you seen this?

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.7b00680

We measured radiocesium in a diverse suite of large predators from the North Pacific Ocean and report no detectable (i.e., ≥ 0.1 Bq kg-1 dry wt) of Fukushima-derived 134Cs in all samples, except in one olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) with trace levels (0.1 Bq kg-1). Levels of 137Cs varied within and across taxa, but were generally consistent with pre-Fukushima levels and were lower than naturally-occurring 40K by one to two orders of magnitude.

-Allen

Fake news!