Did Game Warden Have the Right to Search My Car?

You're more than welcome to express your opinion, but to try and feed it directly at me was misguided.  I'm only here expressing an opinion and not staking any claim in the fight.

You're more than welcome to express your opinion, but to try and feed it directly at me was misguided.  I'm only here expressing an opinion and not staking any claim in the fight.

Ok....... So, express your opinion but no one can then talk about it. Got it.

Talk about it all you want, but when you respond to my opinion directly by trying to lecture me that fishing and hunting is to provide food (not recreation), then that's a target.  And hypocritical. 

 

Talk about it all you want, but when you respond to my opinion directly by trying to lecture me that fishing and hunting is to provide food (not recreation), then that's a target.  And hypocritical.

  I got give ya thats funny. Youre not serious, are you?

Talk about it all you want, but when you respond to my opinion directly by trying to lecture me that fishing and hunting is to provide food (not recreation), then that's a target.  And hypocritical.

  I got give ya thats funny. Youre not serious, are you?

I'm not sure, are you?

Rarely.

But  i went back through and seems to me like a lively exchange of ideas on the proposition that fishing/hunting is a privilege. Good stuff Certainly didnt see any one target or lecturing or feeding.

Rarely.

But  i went back through and seems to me like a lively exchange of ideas on the proposition that fishing/hunting is a privilege. Good stuff Certainly didnt see any one target or lecturing or feeding.

Then we're settled.  Whats next? Let's talk about the broncos.

Ben, were you trying to say that a $3000 watercraft somehow puts the opinion at a different level.  What if it was a subsistence fisherman with a $5000 runabout?  It's all relative ...

-Allen

Ben, were you trying to say that a $3000 watercraft somehow puts the opinion at a different level.  What if it was a subsistence fisherman with a $5000 runabout?  It's all relative ...

-Allen

I can't say that I know enough about that hypothetical person's situation to say what they're using the boat for.  I guess I was trying to talk about the idea of "luxury" items for sake of gathering food.   Would that person need the $5000 runabout to sustain their living?  Could they make due with a $2K tin can?  Was that purchase of the boat an economically wise decision for the person?

Is there anything wrong with sustaining your living and doing so in (more) comfort?

Is there anything wrong with sustaining your living and doing so in (more) comfort?

Absolutely not, but then we're moving into the space of personal choice vs. necessity.

Ben, were you trying to say that a $3000 watercraft somehow puts the opinion at a different level.  What if it was a subsistence fisherman with a $5000 runabout?  It's all relative ...

-Allen

I can't say that I know enough about that hypothetical person's situation to say what they're using the boat for.  I guess I was trying to talk about the idea of "luxury" items for sake of gathering food.   Would that person need the $5000 runabout to sustain their living?  Could they make due with a $2K tin can?  Was that purchase of the boat an economically wise decision for the person?

To me the financial situation of the person has little bearing on validity either side in this debate.  And a $3K kayak is likely more seaworthy and safe than a $2K tin can on the ocean.

-Allen

Ben, were you trying to say that a $3000 watercraft somehow puts the opinion at a different level.  What if it was a subsistence fisherman with a $5000 runabout?  It's all relative ...

-Allen

I can't say that I know enough about that hypothetical person's situation to say what they're using the boat for.  I guess I was trying to talk about the idea of "luxury" items for sake of gathering food.   Would that person need the $5000 runabout to sustain their living?  Could they make due with a $2K tin can?  Was that purchase of the boat an economically wise decision for the person?

To me the financial situation of the person has little bearing on validity either side in this debate.  And a $3K kayak is likely more seaworthy and safe than a $2K tin can on the ocean.

-Allen

But is a $3K kayak more seaworthy and safe than a $800 kayak?

Is there anything wrong with sustaining your living and doing so in (more) comfort?

Absolutely not, but then we're moving into the space of personal choice vs. necessity.

It's my personal choice to exercise my rights.  Just because it is a personal choice does not make my rights any less.

But I see where your own personal choice is to give up your rights.

-Allen

Ben, were you trying to say that a $3000 watercraft somehow puts the opinion at a different level.  What if it was a subsistence fisherman with a $5000 runabout?  It's all relative ...

-Allen

I can't say that I know enough about that hypothetical person's situation to say what they're using the boat for.  I guess I was trying to talk about the idea of "luxury" items for sake of gathering food.   Would that person need the $5000 runabout to sustain their living?  Could they make due with a $2K tin can?  Was that purchase of the boat an economically wise decision for the person?

To me the financial situation of the person has little bearing on validity either side in this debate.  And a $3K kayak is likely more seaworthy and safe than a $2K tin can on the ocean.

-Allen

But is a $3K kayak more seaworthy and safe than a $800 kayak?

In this case ... probably.

-Allen