Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 25, 2026, 02:04:34 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[June 24, 2026, 10:37:50 PM]

[June 24, 2026, 10:28:39 PM]

[June 24, 2026, 06:56:00 PM]

[June 24, 2026, 04:46:26 PM]

by Nawm
[June 24, 2026, 12:38:08 PM]

[June 23, 2026, 02:17:12 PM]

[June 23, 2026, 12:33:53 PM]

[June 23, 2026, 10:29:32 AM]

[June 22, 2026, 08:57:58 PM]

[June 22, 2026, 04:58:29 PM]

[June 22, 2026, 09:42:48 AM]

by Clb
[June 22, 2026, 08:32:50 AM]

[June 21, 2026, 09:37:27 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 05:01:05 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 04:12:35 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 03:18:06 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 09:14:42 AM]

[June 19, 2026, 09:49:48 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 07:49:09 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 06:59:04 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 05:48:32 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 10:20:30 AM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Topic: Is an Illegal Shot Still Illegal, If It’s a Miss?  (Read 840 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hojoman

  • Manatee
  • *****
  • Location: Fremont, CA
  • Date Registered: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 32017
December 6,  2018

Question: I saw a guy shoot at a cormorant while hunting waterfowl. He missed it. I think he may have figured out it was an illegal bird to shoot because later I saw more cormorants fly over him and he didn’t shoot at them. I’m curious – could a game warden have cited the man for shooting at the cormorant, even though he didn’t hit it? (Chris)

Answer: Yes, he could have been cited for “take” of the cormorant, even though he missed. “Take” is defined in the California Fish and Game Code, section 86, as the act of hunting, pursuing, catching, capturing or killing, or the attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill.