Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 23, 2026, 08:41:48 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[Today at 02:17:12 PM]

[Today at 12:33:53 PM]

[Today at 10:29:32 AM]

[Today at 09:50:57 AM]

[June 22, 2026, 08:57:58 PM]

[June 22, 2026, 04:58:29 PM]

[June 22, 2026, 09:42:48 AM]

by Clb
[June 22, 2026, 08:32:50 AM]

[June 21, 2026, 09:37:27 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 05:01:05 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 04:12:35 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 03:18:06 PM]

[June 21, 2026, 09:14:42 AM]

[June 19, 2026, 09:49:48 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 09:24:12 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 07:49:09 PM]

[June 19, 2026, 07:05:08 AM]

[June 18, 2026, 06:59:04 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 05:48:32 PM]

[June 18, 2026, 10:20:30 AM]

[June 17, 2026, 09:17:11 PM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Topic: Sunscreen ratings  (Read 1342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FishinJay

  • Sunrise Prowler 15
  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Indecision may, or may not, be my problem...
  • Location: Milwaukee, WI
  • Date Registered: Aug 2006
  • Posts: 1330
With the many hours that most of us spend outdoors, I thought that this sunscreen information would be interesting.

There are several news articles out about a recent website that rates the safety and effectiveness of several hundred sunscreens. The research was done by the Environmetal Working Group (EWG) and can be found here: http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/special/sunscreens/summary.php

I don't want to start an argument about the EWG, so use the site if it's helpful to you, or ignore it. But, their published methods for the research seem reasonable, and if anything, it gives a good side-by-side comparison of these sunscreens using the same rating methods.

Looking up the sunscreens I use most, this site says they are generally effective but that they contain some questionable ingredients that may be harmful. It may be worthwhile to at least try out some of the top rated suncreens from the list. The site also confirmed what I had always been told by my parents while growing up, which is anything higher than SPF 30 is pointless.

Another interesting point that the study raised was that the FDA has voluntary standards for sunscreen ratings. If the FDA made those standards mandatory, nearly half of all sunscreens would be mis-labled!  :smt103
« Last Edit: June 20, 2007, 12:22:21 PM by Fishin-Jay »
Searching is half the fun: life is much more manageable when thought of as a scavenger hunt as opposed to a surprise party. -Jimmy Buffett


mooch

  • 2006 Angler of the Year
  • Manatee
  • *****
  • Cancer Fighter
  • Location: Half Moon Bay
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 15809
.....all I can say is this: DO NOT APPLY ANY KIND OF SUN SCREEN on your forehead - when paddling around. Last year at Elk, I was blind for nearly 20 minutes because my "sweat & water proof" sunscreen mades it's way to my eyes and it was BAAAAAD  :smt011 Not a good thing coz I was fishing near some boilers  :smt011

If someone can suggest a better (and tested) brand = I'm all ears  :smt045


piski

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • Location: Dolores Lagoon, SF
  • Date Registered: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 3506
Resurrecting this old post because I just saw this article about a new study by the EWG (see article).
Most Sunscreens Fail to Protect
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/mostsunscreensfailtoprotect
Catch & Repeat


 

anything