Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 16, 2025, 02:34:42 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[May 15, 2025, 11:27:57 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 10:04:16 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 08:14:08 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 07:40:57 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 05:33:56 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 03:15:22 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 03:04:23 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 01:20:15 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 01:03:52 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 12:05:52 PM]

[May 15, 2025, 09:50:07 AM]

[May 15, 2025, 09:24:16 AM]

[May 15, 2025, 08:25:58 AM]

[May 14, 2025, 10:05:37 PM]

[May 14, 2025, 04:22:26 PM]

[May 14, 2025, 01:40:56 PM]

by Clb
[May 14, 2025, 11:16:09 AM]

[May 13, 2025, 08:37:33 PM]

[May 13, 2025, 07:22:48 PM]

[May 13, 2025, 12:17:52 PM]

[May 13, 2025, 10:48:08 AM]

[May 13, 2025, 10:11:33 AM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Topic: Incidental Take While Spear Fishing  (Read 755 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hojoman

  • Manatee
  • *****
  • View Profile
  • Location: Fremont, CA
  • Date Registered: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 31954
August 7, 2014

Question: What happens if a spearfishing diver spots a large fish and shoots and spears it without realizing until too late that it’s a giant (black) sea bass or another prohibited species? Then after the fish is speared and brought to the surface, the spearfisher identifies they have a fish they can’t take or possess and promptly returns it to the ocean. Has the spearfisher violated any laws?

A fisherman (angler) who catches a prohibited species while fishing for other species can argue that the take was unintentional/incidental. Could the spearfisher successfully make a similar argument? (Steve H.)

Answer: Spear fishermen are responsible for identifying their targets before they pull the trigger and can be held accountable for shooting a prohibited species. They are also responsible for ensuring that any fish they shoot meets the minimum size limit requirements for that species, again, before they pull the trigger.

A short lingcod or illegal giant sea bass, for example, is unlikely to survive after being shot by a spear fisherman who has the ability to select his target carefully; a short or illegal fish is much more likely to survive being hooked and released by an angler fishing from a boat, who cannot selectively target which individual fish he wishes to catch.

If a diver is unsure about the size or identity of the fish he/she’s aiming at, he/she should choose a different target. Shooting a fish that you’re unsure of could be illegal, and we believe that many spear fishermen would consider it unethical, as well.

All of these same principles also apply to hunters. No one with a rifle, shotgun, spear gun or even bow should pull the trigger unless absolutely 100 percent sure that their intended target is of legal size, species, gender, etc. An accurate (or even lucky) shot made, but with an error in judgment, isn’t worth the repercussions of breaking the very laws enacted to protect the state’s fish and game.


&

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • View Profile
  • Date Registered: Mar 2005
  • Posts: 6585


Dale L

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • View Profile
  • Location: Livermore
  • Date Registered: Dec 2005
  • Posts: 4954
Stupidest question I have seen yet, some are strange but this one? Wow.


 

anything