I'm on the hunt for elusive Baked Tasty Klair Pie (Custard with Chocolate).   

So awesome when the spinoff of a winter thread is so much better than the original...went from Salty to Sweet 

weren't we all young and dumb until we got old and wise?

But I agree, these two have a long way to go before they are no longer part of darwin's theory

I think I can buy a license from this guy I know so I should be good to go 

PB Tastykakes get my vote

welcome to NCKA.

Vash - go getum (Both the fish and the cakes).  Looking forward to reading about all the awesomeness that you will experience. 

As far as salty SOMA goes, forget about it.  Wonder if he had the same response to the folks from Paradise "living off of tax dollars".

and my grandfarther was the foreman on highway 1 between Carmel and SLO when it was being built (damn I'm old).  Tax dollars paid his wage but he worked a hard and honest life.

If I have learned anything this year(questionable), is that anything to the far left and to the far right is not where I want to be.  I definitely have gained a better appreciation of each sides views and the lengths and means each side will use to make their point.  I have also seen how it tears communities apart and empowers each side of the spectrum to go to the extremes.

Yes, stand up for what you believe and argue for what you believe, but know that at the end of the day you may or may not win your argument and life will go on. 

The bear hunting legislation was pulled when the community that was actually going to be impacted spoke up and their voices were heard.  Hopefully the same will apply to the crabbing legislation. 

The voices on an advisory council are important and I respect anyone that voluntarily takes the position and sticks with it. 

Adam, from everything I see on this thread and your other posts, you are the right guy to be on the board as your passion and understanding of the area will be of great benefit. 

do they promise the divorce will be twice as fast as a regular tandem?

Quote from: DavidMel on January 26, 2021, 03:30:14 PM

Cyclist are required to wear helmets but there are plenty that choose not to.  No license or safety class required to ride a bike yet they share the some of the same area (the road) as licensed drivers.  Common sense is not something our government should or could try to regulate.

Bicycle Helmet use is mandatory only 18 and under.  At majority age, the law prioritizes choice over forced utilization of safety gear.  The age related helmet statute is not directed at common sense so much as protection of still-developing brains and bodies.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=21212.&lawCode=VEH

Thank you for pointing this out.