Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 30, 2024, 11:55:59 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[Today at 11:20:36 PM]

[Today at 09:28:57 PM]

[Today at 07:23:08 PM]

[Today at 05:07:39 PM]

[Today at 04:38:38 PM]

[Today at 02:54:57 PM]

[Today at 10:05:11 AM]

[Today at 10:01:42 AM]

[Today at 02:43:19 AM]

[May 29, 2024, 09:38:24 PM]

[May 29, 2024, 08:39:01 PM]

[May 29, 2024, 07:13:07 PM]

[May 29, 2024, 06:27:58 PM]

[May 29, 2024, 02:21:55 PM]

[May 29, 2024, 02:09:03 PM]

[May 29, 2024, 01:25:41 PM]

[May 29, 2024, 09:53:16 AM]

[May 29, 2024, 05:26:11 AM]

[May 28, 2024, 09:32:48 PM]

[May 28, 2024, 08:53:38 PM]

[May 28, 2024, 05:07:25 PM]

[May 28, 2024, 04:06:45 PM]

by B0B
[May 28, 2024, 11:26:01 AM]

[May 28, 2024, 07:19:38 AM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - polepole

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 529
31
In 1982 there were 29,625,515 pounds taken.  :smt009

-Allen

32
A quick scan.  The majority of the catch is  boccacio, widow, and chilipepper.  I'd guess that the take on these species is going up as the deep water rockfish opportunities open back up.

-Allen

33
Yeah, I was using Rockfish ** too.  Sounds like that is not the correct thing to do.

-Allen

34
I had posted annual commercial takes for the US in another thread and it was very flat for the last 20 years.  But the NOAA also allows you to query their databases and you can pull up by state / species.  So I queried California, last 15 years, all species of rockfish.  The results were eye opening.   Commercial rockfish take is climbing very rapidly.  Columns are Pounds, Tons, $.

I'm getting different numbers when I run the query, using this page, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/foss/f?p=215:200

-Allen

35
Remember that the people proposing the new MPAs will need a project next year, and the year after that, etc. Their projects will not involve adding fishing opportunities. Only mother nature can do that. The quillbacks are fine, rockfish and lings are abundant, and there's no actual problem for these clowns to address, but they've become more aggressive about restricting fishing and crabbing anyway.

These people are either politically compromised, easily manipulated by pressure, or true believers raised on every nature show telling them the ocean is dying because of fisherman. If there are no "problems" for them to address, they'll make things up and that's exactly what the new MPAs are. It's just the latest made-up cause. They want to reduce fishing opportunities gradually while saying that's not what they are doing. If limits are cut, that's not coming back. If MPAs are established, the fishing opportunities aren't coming back.

And all the while we're throwing stones at the commercials, and the charterboat anglers, and any motorized anglers for that matter.  Sigh ...

-Allen

36
What does any of that have to do with Quillback?  And why the negativity towards charter boats?

-Allen

37
General Talk / Re: Like to see this puppy on the Ocean
« on: March 01, 2024, 01:12:56 PM »
You'd be sitting on a floating penis.

-Allen

38
Pay It Forward / Re: Fundraiser / Raffle for Kiet Pham aka Bluegill
« on: February 29, 2024, 11:01:34 AM »
Thank you Josh, Ty, and Dylan for contributing packages to the raffle.

Pacific Redwood Hideaway is an awesome place, stayed there myself in Jan.  I've also fished with Ty and foraged with Dylan.  These are all primo packages.

-Allen

39
Wanted To Buy / Re: WTB: Drift Boat (2-3 person)
« on: February 22, 2024, 01:05:13 PM »
I have a 12' fiberglass mini-drifter.  Seats 2.  Solid hull.  Needs attention, like new seats, oars, and perhaps some paint if that's important to you.  I could let it go fairly cheap.  Send me a PM if interested.

-Allen

40
You didn’t make it about me and did offer a direct counter to my statement, which is fabulous. There’s obviously nothing personal about that, but it did seem a little beside the point after I attempted to clarify that I was referring to the Quillback-related split season depth restrictions. All good bro.

I have failed to be precise and specific throughout this thread in expressing my frustration because it comes from an overall overarching lack of trust. Would be thrilled beyond measure to be wrong about all of this. Hopefully the benevolent, people-loving folks who are making our fishing rules aren’t as full of crap as they seem to be. Fishing is the only thing I have in my life for my mental health and it’s beyond important. Not being allowed to fish for some Browns in Capitola, or for a lingcod out of the harbor in Santa Cruz because some Quillback many many miles away may or may not have an issue was complete nonsense last year no matter how you frame it.

And I completely understand your statement on lack of trust of CDFW.  I wrestle with that myself, having a healthy distrust of them at the same time hoping they will do their job best they can.  Because really, there is no one to do it better, as it is their responsibility.

-Allen

41
Did you guys just start fishing last year? Because that’s what it sounds like—please have some perspective. I’ve only been paying attention to RCG regs since ~1999. And guess what: the regs for seasons/depth/posession limits change every few years. That’s how the adaptive management system works. Would you prefer the alternative? A system that does not adapt to the constantly-changing population of various species.
So the question about returning to seasons without depth restrictions is stupid. Unless you have a time machine and you’re talking about the 1990s. Because that’s the last time we have unabated access to rockfish at all depths.
But thanks for lobbying for more bureaucratic restrictions and giving the commission additional fodder…the companies that produce fish decenders owe you guys a bunch of money.
"So the question about returning to seasons without depth restrictions is stupid." Thanks for that helpful addition to the discussion. Perhaps I should have been more specific about the quillback-related depth restrictions, and I also remember the deeper water being closed for many years. There's a well-worn history of bureaucracies taking power for real or imagined "problems" and then never giving that power back, but go ahead and dismiss concerns over that sort of thing as "stupid" if it makes you feel good. In fact, insulting people with different views, like you did here, is totally awesome, especially for the "global moderator" of an open forum. If feeling superior to others is what you need, i'm glad to help give you the opportunity.

Whether or not Sin Coast has an opinion on this as a global moderator is immaterial.  I don't see any personal attacks or insults from him, he's entitled to think that a line of questioning is stupid.  That doesn't mean he called anyone stupid.

Never giving back?  Some of us were prepared to never see a deep water season again.  Heck, the deep water fisheries weren't supposed to recover enough to allow a deep water fishery until like 2030.  So in fact, they did give back by opening it.

-Allen

He's totally insulting people with different views, regardless of you attempting to gaslight about it. And I can point it out. And he can take it. Claiming it isn't happening is different though. And I even clarified what i meant about the depth restrictions, yet you think you're dunking on me by mentioning the deep water. Have a great day, friends, and I hope we can go fishing soon.

You're entitled to your opinion.  However, we do not hold moderators to a different level than we hold anyone else.  Never have, we're not that special, so I don't expect you to either.

I don't think I'm dunking on you.  In fact, I don't think I made a statement about you.  We have a saying here ... debate the issue, not the person.  And in this case, the issue was a statement saying they never give back.  I pointed out a precise example counter to that statement.

-Allen

42
Did you guys just start fishing last year? Because that’s what it sounds like—please have some perspective. I’ve only been paying attention to RCG regs since ~1999. And guess what: the regs for seasons/depth/posession limits change every few years. That’s how the adaptive management system works. Would you prefer the alternative? A system that does not adapt to the constantly-changing population of various species.
So the question about returning to seasons without depth restrictions is stupid. Unless you have a time machine and you’re talking about the 1990s. Because that’s the last time we have unabated access to rockfish at all depths.
But thanks for lobbying for more bureaucratic restrictions and giving the commission additional fodder…the companies that produce fish decenders owe you guys a bunch of money.
"So the question about returning to seasons without depth restrictions is stupid." Thanks for that helpful addition to the discussion. Perhaps I should have been more specific about the quillback-related depth restrictions, and I also remember the deeper water being closed for many years. There's a well-worn history of bureaucracies taking power for real or imagined "problems" and then never giving that power back, but go ahead and dismiss concerns over that sort of thing as "stupid" if it makes you feel good. In fact, insulting people with different views, like you did here, is totally awesome, especially for the "global moderator" of an open forum. If feeling superior to others is what you need, i'm glad to help give you the opportunity.

Whether or not Sin Coast has an opinion on this as a global moderator is immaterial.  I don't see any personal attacks or insults from him, he's entitled to think that a line of questioning is stupid.  That doesn't mean he called anyone stupid.

Never giving back?  Some of us were prepared to never see a deep water season again.  Heck, the deep water fisheries weren't supposed to recover enough to allow a deep water fishery until like 2030.  So in fact, they did give back by opening it.

-Allen

43
CA Regulations / Re: REPORT -2024 Nearshore Rockfish Season Survey
« on: February 04, 2024, 06:53:35 AM »
The site is NorCal Kayak Anglers, or NCKA.  We are based in Northern California.  This site URL is norcalkayakanglers.com, not northerncaliforniakayakanglers.com.

Please don’t refer to it as Northern California Kayak Anglers when interacting with other organizations.  If we’re confused, imagine how confused they are.  You are only diluting the “brand”.

-Allen

In the past. People asked me what "NorCal" stands for and I replied "Northern California".  So now if someone asks ne, you suggest we tell them it stands for nothing, just NorCal?

It’s simple enough to say that we are NorCal Kayak Anglers, generally based in Northern California.

Curious, are there really people in NorCal that don’t know what it is a shortened form of?  Perhaps send them to F&S.  Kidding …

-Allen

44
CA Regulations / Re: REPORT -2024 Nearshore Rockfish Season Survey
« on: February 03, 2024, 03:13:47 PM »
The site is NorCal Kayak Anglers, or NCKA.  We are based in Northern California.  This site URL is norcalkayakanglers.com, not northerncaliforniakayakanglers.com.

Please don’t refer to it as Northern California Kayak Anglers when interacting with other organizations.  If we’re confused, imagine how confused they are.  You are only diluting the “brand”.

-Allen

45
CA Regulations / Re: Email F&G Commission to oppose MPA expansion petitions
« on: February 03, 2024, 03:04:22 PM »
Where there any proposals to reduce MPA’s?  If not, why not?  We should draft some.  Maybe too late for this round, but some time in the future.

-Allen

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 529