Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 03, 2024, 06:32:11 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[Today at 02:25:49 AM]

[May 02, 2024, 10:09:54 PM]

[May 02, 2024, 09:13:28 PM]

[May 02, 2024, 03:03:07 PM]

[May 02, 2024, 10:34:13 AM]

[May 02, 2024, 08:03:44 AM]

[May 01, 2024, 09:06:36 AM]

[April 30, 2024, 09:10:03 PM]

[April 30, 2024, 06:36:16 PM]

[April 30, 2024, 03:32:29 PM]

[April 30, 2024, 02:15:19 PM]

[April 30, 2024, 10:36:12 AM]

[April 30, 2024, 09:08:11 AM]

[April 29, 2024, 09:16:05 PM]

[April 29, 2024, 07:01:31 PM]

[April 29, 2024, 01:56:07 PM]

[April 28, 2024, 08:31:45 PM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jwsmith

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 27
1
Police CANNOT act as if citizens they confront are about to kill them.
Just......CANNOT......act.....that way.
The reality is opposite.

And within the domain of Park Enforcement....???...!!!....even less so.

CANNOT...drive up like madmen
CANNOT...put hands anywhere near a sidearm

SRJ cites a prior GGNRA murder case---girl's body in trunk---It is irrelevant.
Less than 1:1000 Golden Gate National Recreation Area cases involve serious...anything.  In fact, as contrasted with "the content of all citzen contacts"....less than 1:10,000.

Officers CANNOT go around, touching their gunbelts, cannot act roughly, when dealing with just-citizens.

CANNOT---CANNOT---CANNOT---CANNOT...the most fundamental part of professionalism is courtesy.

Yes police get shot-in-the-line-of-duty.
So do convenience store clerks.

While (particularly Metropolitan) police work is a dangerous occupation, police work DOES NOT FALL within the list of the ten most dangerous jobs.  

 
They are:

Timber Cutters  117.8 fatalies per 100,000
Fishers 71.1
Pilots and navigators 69.8  
Structural metal workers 58.2  
Drivers-sales workers 37.9  
Roofers 37  
Electrical power installers 32.5  
Farm occupations 28  
Construction laborers 27.7  
Truck drivers 25

POLICE:   21.8

Police training, equipment and proceedure are principal reasons that police work does not generate more injuries/fatalities.

But badge-heavy over-the-top conduct is expressly forbidden in all police academys and departments.

The bottom line is....officers cannot deal roughly with contacts on any PRETEXT of personal danger.

Another somewhat paradoxical but entirely understandable fact is that the very "danger-of-the-job" is in fact one of the primary frequently cited ATTRACTIONS of police work as an occupation.  Police work is not boreing.  

What's that fabulous line that Marshall Matt Dillon intoned at the introduction of every GUNSMOKE show? He said:   "It's a chancy job, and it makes a man watchful . . . and a little lonely..."  AND THAT'S ABOUT AS PERFECT A DESCRIPTION AS CAN BE MADE....except in the case of modern police, they cannot let---JUST CANNOT LET---the "chancy" nature of the job cause them to turn to cowardice and adopt badge-heavy brutal behavior(s).

PAY ATTENTION DAMMIT:

It's irrational to go into police work because it is exciting and then behave like a badge-heavy tyrant on the pretext that the job is dangerous.

Law enforcement CANNOT afford to become "an-enemy-of-the-people."
Law enforcement CANNOT afford to behave in crazy ways that are out-of-proportion with risk-realities.
Every Logical Mandate....requires police to make all their behavior(s) proportionate.

The crime of ASSAULT....is putting someone in fear.
Absent a real-viable-criminal-charge, police have no right to put a citizen in fear.
Police have no right to put a citizen in fear for "violations cases."
Police had no right make ITSONICE to sit on the ground....demeaning him...
The treatment of ITSONICE ....was absolutely    l a c e d     with badge-heavy menacing frightening unnecessary demeaning conduct.

The CORRECT Police Procedure in ITSONICE's case was this:

Officer stops his approach to ITSONICE at 8-feet:

"Sir!    
"Please put down your tackle box and your rod.
"Get out your identification.
"I am going to cite you for entering a closed area."

No gunbelt touching....no badge-heavy "drive-up"....NOT approaching ITSONICE in a jack-booted way....NOT prefacing contact with
ITSONICE with the arrogant and simultaneous stupidly-useless "We've Been Watching You..!!.."

Subsequent civil conversation-----could then negotiate its way to relelase-with-warning....or...not.

====================================================

I am no police hater --- but I did work for seven years as "A Police-Officer-of-Police-Officers."

I worked 7-years as THE OREGONIAN'S (Portland,OR) police reporter while obtaining an engineering degree.  My/The Paper's office was in the (old) police building at 209 SW Oak....I covered police and courts.

In my tenure I was personally responsible for the termination of three municipal court judges,  JJ Labadie for delilitating old age;  Edmund Jordan for cruelty to misdemeanant vagrants in his morning dock;  Arron Brown for persistantly mis-applying the Law.    I was responsible for disbarment of a dep. city attorney for prejudicial handling of a tavern-keepers license.

My reports caused four police officers to be fired, all separate incidents.   One officer---for deliberately turning on the lawn sprinklers of the Portland Fire Bureau
because he wanted to enjoy the sight of thirty three old-down-and-out-drunks who were catching a few rays of sunshine on that lawn....jump out of their sleep and run to the perimiter sidewalk.

I do see things----as a police officer sees them.
My function then and my habit now...is to see Police Officers...AS a police officer ,looking at correct and incorrect police function.

A police officer, Doyle Souders, taught me something:   That you can take a "subject"...any "subject"...you can address him and treat that
subject in just such a way that even if he is a Casper Milquetoast personality, you can excite such anger (by your behavior) and such outrage
and such personal hatred (for you-yourself) that-----you can almosst guarantee----that this subject will "offer conduct" to you which you can
define as Assault-Of-A-Police-Officer....thus giving you CAUSE to take him down for a felony.    

Doyle Souders taught me....that you can treat a man one way and he will ASSENT to his arrest.
Doyle Souders taught me....that you can treat an arrestee another way and he'll offer conduct that lets you kill him.

So TELL ME.....yeah....you just try to tell me...about Badge Heavy.

I know "Badge Heavy."

There is pin-headed Badge Heavy
There is race-hatred Badge Heavy
There is "cowardice" Badge Heavy---you see it in female officers who are frightened of their shadow.
There is the Badge Heavy sadist who gets that certain lift from having that badge and that power and that gun.

Takes all kinds to make a world.

==============================================

A final word(s)  ((Judd Smith NEVER writes   o n e    word))   ---this:  about police training films.
Police training films breed police fear.
Police fear breeds police misconduct.

And the thing is......it's irrational.
Here's the deal:

Training films are a very profitable business.
OK you are going to produce a police training film.
For One Thing:  It's gotta be scarier...than the last film the cops saw.
You draw up your "scene"...it has cars, darkness, loose clothing, and always:  Starting with an innocuous "stop."
You count your "roles" and you hire your actors-----for actors you hire gymnasts and ballet-dancers
You set up the props and run your actors through the action against a stopwatch.  That "TIME" is the benchmark.
Now you run the same action again and again always for "time."
You scream at your people...you organize re-prize runs...the aim is always to shorten the "time."
Your actors...organize and optimize...every motion.  Every motion.  
Weapons are organized-into-clothing....it's optimize...optimize...optimize...and shorten that "time."
Finally you have a choreography....that's lightening fast and scary to watch.......
But it's been optimized to the point that it no longer depicts any real-scene reality.
What happens is terrifying....the cops get all shot up....the whole thing....screaming speed...

The training academys buy it....departments buy it.....police see it....god it goes down like lightening.

An officer who sees that film --- and who does not intuit that "something is wrong...shit...this happens just all to fast and all too perfectly"  ----  The officer who leaves the viewing room thinking that:  "This is reality
and good God...I don't see how a guy can defend against stuff likethat."  ---  That officer is going to be a frightened officer.

Now a Frightened Officer is going to talk excitedly about how dangerous police work is.
A Frightened Officer is going to tell you about how a guy who uses a prohibited beach can be carrying an air-cooled .30
An officer whose seen too many Training Films will readily adopt irrational views of crime-in-America and the DANGER of even being a Park Policeman.
A officer-made-coward...well...here's somethingto chew on:

Most fundamental rule about FEAR:
FEAR is the mother of HATE
If I fear you, the sum of my fear translates to hate.
Now if an OFFICER is AFRAID of citizens.....???.....
Well the sum-total of his behavior toward them is going to feel very much like hatred.

And then next in line:
Fear feeds Fear
Hatred feeds more fear and ... your "subject" can read it off your body language...like it was written in orange flourescent.

So:   Evaluating the conduct of those officers who approached OHSONICE...   There's no question these men are not suited to their work.
Evaluating SRJ's knee-jerk defense of those men ..... an endorsement ... of men who are not suited to their work.

As a former Police-officer-of-police ..... and I still have the brittle eyes and sharp insights  ....  well.....

Judd Smith
1589 Campus Drive
Berkeley, CA  94708
js1589@berkeley.edu

By the way----I never have been perfectly comfortable with people who sign themselves with "handles"....and I never did visit
the New Orleans "Marti Gras" because I don't feel perfectly comfortable with people who wear masks.

It's just me, I guess.




p

2
OK....no apology forthcoming....
Instead an explanation of the logic, which I kind of think you will find persuasive.

Police work --- the initial contact with most subjects --- occurs out-of-sight to anyone but an individual officer.
Certainly .... unwitnessed by unbiased civilians.
Co-subjects mostly don't count as witnesses because of bias reasons.
Typically the most "reliable" witnesses are other officers.
But in cases where misconduct is alleged, experience has proven time and time again that police testimony is often protective.

THEREFORE......when police misconduct is described from a witness and in circumstances which lend themselves to direct belief of that described misconduct --- it is not time to be ambiguous in condemnation of the conduct, of the officer, of his competence to carry that very very special trust that DERIVES its importance from the very fact that under a huge percentage of actual-event arrest and contact circumstances absolutely no possibility exsists of testing or even slightly evaluating what actually happened or knowing step-by-step conduct(s) of the officer.


I find ITSONICE's account believable in every detail.
His post was just to advise us......what happened.

Now if you believe ITSONICE account:

The officers did not have an offense to proceed on.
The officers "threw on" lies....that they did have an offense.
The officers did not afford any degree of rational treatment to ITSONICE, given that there was not one iota of "probable cause" to suspect that he was anything other than a law-abiding citizen.
Since "battery" is hitting a fellow and "assult" is putting him in fear, one of the officers by putting his hand on his weapon, committed "assult under color of law" which is an extremely enhanced degree of any other form of civil or criminal assault.
In terms of "right to be there," no "ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE" was in effect so ITSONICE had every right to be where he was.
Furthermore ITSONICE was in possession of a valid California Fishing License...giving him the special status of being a "licensee especially authorized by law to enter any public fishing venue in the State of California and to fish there."
The officers DID NOT act with the circumspection that citizens are entitled to expect from officers in a NATIONAL RECREATION AREA and from officers who are hired as "park police/wardens."

NO PROBABLE CAUSE.......AND NO OFFENSE.....

These are sweeping facts --- police are trained to "triage what they have" with respect to evidence, with respect to probable cause, with respect to "situational threat." 
(To Reviwew:  The Golden Gate National Recreation Area...Issues of "entry" and "fishing" in the presence (ITSONICE's testimony) numerous other individuals already present in the very venue where "entry" was a question...Additionally it was Open Space where concealment and flight were both not available and not at issue.)

The officers-in-question did NONE of this triage.

THE FACTS OF THE SCENE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS did NOT invoke any "standard police policy" (as Officer SRJ alleges) of forcing ITSONICE to sit or assume any special attitude.
Contrary to SRJ's belligerant and completely wrong proclamations: 
"Standard Police Policy" is to be courteous and to NOT invoke special restraints or measures where...
   There is no offense...
   Where the officers have greater need to ask questions and determine circumstances---than the "directed objective" of an arrest.
   Where there is no probable cause.    Remember, you civilians,  Police live and die on probable-cause issues.
   There was ZERO justification---for approaching ITSONICE aggressively in their vehicle.
   And on and on.

Therefore the officers acted as badge-heavy bullys....   c o m p l e t e l y   ....out of accord with professional conduct standards.
It is very important to get rid not only of mis-acting police.....but it is equally important to extend the most stringent Administrative Oversight to situations where sworn police make irresponsible statements in support of police who have been patently wrong---criminal or nearly-criminal in their conduct---...I am referring to SRJ's statements, which are indefensible even from his own department's written policies and procedures.

I find that ITSONICE was treated terribly terribly wrongly.
I absolutely would not want any of you, to be so-treated.
I have collateral fear---for what happened subsequently to the non-english speakers who ITSONICE testified were fishing in that area.

I feel that there is "high risk" that these badge-heavy fools:
   1) were bottom-of-the-class grads in their Bachelpor-of-science law enforcement work
   2) were bottom-of-the-class grads of their "cert" training
   3) were turned down for "real police jobs" in SF, Oak, Albany, Richmond, San Leandro...etc..etc..because their interviewers found that their statements showed an utter lack-of-grasp of .... everything.
   4) were "hired into" park-police positions because in actual fact --- the low end does get hired ... by agencies whos "Main Mission" is directed more toward "light enforcement."

And I feel very strongly-----that Administrators should be notified----that in light of the "ITSONICE-case" circumstances all three of these Golden Gate National Recreation Area officers should undergo a penetrating scruteny.

Judd Smith
1589 Campus Drive
Berkeley, CA  94708
js1589@berkeley.edu


3
Well.....from the facts stated I have another cut on the events:

SRT and his vociferously-endorsment of fellow GGNRA park service officers represents actual felony criminal conduct (Assault under Color of Law)....because they had no offence of any kind right from the outset.

1)  The shore and the waters of an around Bonita Point are wholely open to fishing
2)  Without "Closed to all Access"  "Prohibited Area" signs and fencing there is no administrative closure

It is an absolute:   With Administrative Closures----there is no closure without absolutely thorough un-ambiguous signage.

Therefore these badge-heavy eager-beaver fools.....HAD NO OFFENSE....HAD NO AUTHORITY.

ITSONICE wrote that the belligerant officer placed his hand on his gun.
Who are we to believe, ITSONICE, or this very belligerant fellow SRT himself, who was not there but who is    o h    s o    s u r e   that his bud would never do that.
It remains a fact: That since there was no vioation WHATEVER and no behavior that would warrent the use of or the threat of "deadly force" the man who placed his hand on his gun did in fact commit felony assult.
For the un-initiated in law, one does not have to hit a man to assault him.

Any reader of this contact report surely understands that GGNRA Park Officers are NOT Oakland police working the Avenues at night.
SRT mouthes the silly wish that he could bring all dead officers back to life.

SRT is a fool, a total fool, he is a badge-heavy fool, he does not understand HE IS WORKING PARK DUTY!!!!
SRT and any PARK officer who thinks or acts like him should be relieved of badge and job.

Park duty, as any reader will readily understand and agree, PRESUMES an entirely different service-venue than Metropolitan City daylight service (where still...PROFESSIONAL officers make the assumption wherever possible that the citizen they are dealing with is a law-abiding responsible individual.   NIGHTIME Metropolitan Police duty is more risky an itself authorizes the use of additonal layers of "police procedure" but even in cities at night PROFESSIONAL police maintain a courteous alert circumspection.
SRT and his coherts badge-heavy readiness to assume the worst is....in the setting of a park unrealistic and criminally incompetent.

Badge-heaviness betrays that an officer has adopted a flat catagorization of "THEM" and "US" with respect to citizen contacts.
Metropolitan police forces look for, and discharge, officers whose citizen-contacts betray such attitudes.

In a Park this is no only unwarranted, it is madness, it is officially incompetent-by-park-policy.

ITSONICE should write these men up.
They can be identified by time-of-day and location.
He does not need their IDs.

SRT does not belong in police service
The officers who contacted ITSONICE directly....do not belong in police service.
The Golden Gate National Recreation Area needs neither fools, nor bullys in its service.

Judd

4
General Fishing Tips / Adjust-A-Bubble floats.....
« on: August 10, 2009, 08:28:33 AM »
Adjust-A-Bubble floats....

http://www.rainbowplastics.com/cart/display.php3?ID=I493&token=98aec46797f7d65319

.....are the only "answer" to casting flies and very-light lures....where AFTER THE CAST you want the float to behave with "neutral buoyancy" and not "drag the surface" creating noise and a wake.

Judd

5
General Talk / Re: BEAUTIFUL!!!!
« on: July 19, 2009, 11:35:00 AM »
It is pretty.
The faces are nice to look at.
There's a "nature film" documentary of the Zambezi (sp?) River where it cascades over Victoria Falls.   
Perhaps you've seen it...if not, look for it.
The film includes extended footage of an old fisherman at the falls.
I've seen this film two or three times and every time I'm fascinated by his face and personality.
There's a quiet human depth.
The world is a big place.

Judd

6
Fish Talk / Re: Eat your own bait!?
« on: July 09, 2009, 03:02:19 PM »
When I go out with my cast-net along the beach I always catch surf-perch shiners.
I keep the smallest ones that I want for bait that day and throw back the larger.
I throw a 16-foot diameter net with 1/4-inch mesh.

WOULD YOU///DO YOU/// EAT THOSE GUYS???...!!!...????
They have biggish scales...you'd hafta scale them.

I'm really kinda dubious but I think I'm wanting-to-be-convinced
Maybe.

Judd

7
Fish Talk / Re: Eat your own bait!?
« on: July 08, 2009, 09:10:53 AM »
OK....some knowledgeable person.....tell me how its done.

Bait-sized fish are as much bone fin & scale as meat.
Some have pretty sizable scales.

How.....do you make this work?

(When I lived in Portland,OR....we regularly ate smelt (which are bait-fish sized) by very
lightly frying them in butter and then "boneing them like trout" ....where holding the tail-fin
elevated, you use a fork to tease away the "bottom fillet"...and then as you lift the tail
the meat separates from the backbone.   Flip the fish  and do the same for the other side.
Now you have relatively bone-free meat.)

If you are barbequeing the fish...I'm a little dubbious how that'd be, with the bones & all.

Please..!!!...

Judd

8
Recipes / Re: More Lethal Than Blowfish
« on: July 08, 2009, 09:02:25 AM »
Yakuza.....have you been to the "99 Ranch Market" located in that tiny shopping center tucked into the NW corner of Albany Hill (in Albany, CA) and I-80?    It's an awesomely good asian market with a just-fabulous fresh fish display.

(You would get off at the Central exit from I-80 and then immediately East of the Freeway and right beside the Shell Station turn south into the south-bound access road.)

I could live my whole life eating nothing but asian dishes.

Judd

9
General Talk / Re: Fishing Reports going members only today
« on: July 06, 2009, 09:24:13 PM »
Wow...I misread everything.

Thought the new rule would be that without having posted 10-reports TO FISHING REPORTS you would have no access to fishing reports.

I thought that   p e o p l e   l i k e   m e   were being targeted:  People seemingly who have everything to say about everything, but who do not contribute to the fundamentally most interesting function of NorCal Kayak Anglers...that very thing:  reports & pictures.

Now that I've tumbled to the fact that your gunna allow ME....with my paucity of good contributions....to have Fishing Report Access....     My true internal reaction is quite confused.   My first question is:  Why on Earth..??..!!..??    My second reaction...is gratitude, I guess.   My third reaction is...well, I really must bring my camera along and DO some quality fish pictures.

In the meantime...you've seen this before but I'll post it again:

10
General Talk / Re: Fishing Reports going members only today
« on: July 06, 2009, 01:14:44 PM »
Yer gunna make me take my stupid camera along.....
Oh well....maybe that's to the good....for me and you.

I've been following this controversy (silently) for a long time.
I've never quite seen the sense of it.
It strikes me as "clubby" and "high-schoolish"...but it's your website.

The decision isn't monumentally bad.
Doesn't seem monumentally good.
Seems unlikely to change the charachter of the website or its members.

Judd

11
General Talk / Re: California Department of Parks
« on: July 04, 2009, 04:57:54 PM »
Mahi......no, I don't think the parks would be as "nice" as they are.

When budget-cutting, I'd chose not-as-nice-but-open.....to....."we are closing the parks because we cannot staff all the extraneous services that are the result of years of Bureaucratic Empire Building"...

Judd

12
General Talk / California Department of Parks
« on: July 03, 2009, 10:29:04 AM »
Everybody seems to be missing the point:
I mean....you are all missing the point    BIG TIME....!!!....

...CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS....

Has built an entire bureaucracy around it that does not need to exist.

They have spun off an entire "parks police" group....
They have spun off a mysterious "Wildlife" function that pretend to do scientific monitoring
They have spun off a "parks & nature INTERPRETIVE" function...
They have spun off a "park reservations" function.

FIRE THEM ALL.....close every position in PARKS.

1)   The state should CONTRACT for garbage pickup & toilet maintenance,
2)   Carpentery, Painting and Maintenance should be CONTRACTED on an as-needed basis.
3)   Police Service..is already the PREPAID DUTY..!!!..of the County Sheriff in whose jurisdiction the park lies.

While a "RESERVATION SERVICE" for park usage is "nice"....it is certainly not a REQUIREMENT.
In observation of hard budgetary times, the parks can simply be on first-come-first-served.
This arrangement would be less elegant than reservations...but our Parks ran that way for decades.

ALL OF CALIFORNIA PARKS CAN STAY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITHOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD THAT NOW SURROUNDS THEM.

The California Department of Parks is a wildly eggregious example of bureaucratic empire-building; of FINDING "ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS" that in face are no way essential, important,or necessary and in fact which, when arrayed against other functions that are already performed by other state, county or city agencies, are strictly and inanely duplicative.

=================

I THOUGHT YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN A LISTING OF ALL THE "CAREER POSITIONS" THAT EXIST WITHIN THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS.
These positions were taken from their "careers with the Park Department" webpage

This is what you are paying for.
Is it reasonable:


Account Clerk II
Accountant I
Accountant Trainee
Accounting Administrator I
ACCOUNTING ADMR II
Accounting Officer
Accounting Technician
Administrative Assistant I
Administrative Assistant II
Administrative Officer I
Administrative Officer II
Administrative Officer III
Assistant Information Systems Analyst
Associate Accounting Analyst
Associate Budget Analyst
Associate Governmental Program Analyst
Associate Information Systems Analyst
Associate Landscape Architect
Associate Management Analyst
Associate Management Auditor
Associate Personnel Analyst
Associate Programmer Analyst
Business Service Assistant
Business Service Officer I
Business Service Officer II
Business Service Officer III
Career Executive Assignment
Chief Deputy Director
Data Processing Manager II
Deputy Director Communications
Deputy Director For Community Affairs
Deputy Director, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation
Deputy Director, Office of Marketing and Revenue Generation
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
Digital Print Operator II
Director
Executive Assistant
Executive Secretary I
Graduate Student Assistant
Information Officer I (Specialist)
Information Systems Technician Specialist I
Labor Relations Analyst
Labor Relations Manager I
Mailing Machines Operator I
Management Service Technician
Office Assistant
Office Services Supervisor I
Office Services Supervisor II
Office Technician
Personnel Services Supervisor I
Personnel Specialist
Personnel Supervisor I
Regional Administrative Technician
Regional Interpretive Specialist
Research Analyst I
Research Analyst II
Research Program Specialist I
Research Program Specialist II
Research Writer
Secretary
Senior Accounting Officer
Senior Administrative Analyst -Accounting Systems
Senior Information Systems Analyst
Senior Personnel Specialist
Special Assistant To The Director
Staff Counsel III
Staff Counsel
Staff Information Systems Analyst
Staff Management Auditor
Staff Services Analyst
Staff Services Management Auditor
Staff Services Manager I
Staff Services Manager II
Staff Services Manager III
Stanford Mansion Director
State Historic Preservation Officer
Supervising Management Auditor
Telecommunications Systems Analyst II
Training Officer I
Education and Interpretation Positions

Archivist I
Archivist II
Associate Editor of Publications
Exhibit Designer/Coordinator
Exhibit Specialist
Exhibit Technician
Graphic Designer I
Graphic Designer II
Graphic Designer III
Guide I Historical Monument
Guide II Historical Monument
Guide Trainee Historical Monument
Photographer
Regional Interpretive Specialst
Research Writer
Senior Photographer
State Historian I
State Historian II
State Historian III
State Park Interpreter I
State Park Interpreter II
State Park Interpreter III
Supervising Librarian I
Facilities Positions

Architectural Designer
Associate Architect
Associate Civil Engineer
Associate Estimator Of Building Construction
Automobile Mechanic
Boat Operator
Carpenter I
Carpenter II
Carpenter Supervisor
Civil Engineering Associate
Civil Engineering Technician II
Construction Supervisor I
Construction Supervisor II
Construction Supervisor III
Departmental Construction and Maintenance Supervisor
Electrician I
Equipment Management Supervisor
Groundskeeper
Heavy Equipment Mechanic
Laboratory Technician-Chemical Analysis
Laborer
Landscape Architect
Lead Groundskeeper
Maintenance Aide
Maintenance Mechanic
Materials And Stores Specialist
Mechanic's Helper
Museum Custodian
Museum Technician

Painter I
Park Landscape Maintenance Technician
Park Maintenance Assistant
Park Maintenance Assistant
Park Maintenance Chief I
Park Maintenance Chief II
Park Maintenance Chief III
Park Maintenance Supervisor
Park Maintenance Worker I
Park Maintenance Worker I
Park Maintenance Worker II
Rail Transportation Assistant
Railroad Restoration Specialist
Restoration and Maintenance Lead Worker, Historic Railroads
Restoration Supervisor II
Restoration Work Specialist

Senior Architect
Senior Civil Engineer
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Senior Land Agent
Senior Land Surveyor
Senior Landscape Architect
Senior Restoration Architect
Skilled Laborer
Skilled Trades Journeyman
Sr. Maintenance Aide
State Park Equipment Operator
State Park Land Officer
Stationary Engineer
Supervising Architect
Supervising Groundskeeper II
Supervising Land Agent
Supervising Landscape Architect
Transportation Surveyor Party Chief
Transportation Surveyor
Warehouse Worker
Water and Sewage Plant Supervisor
Water and Sewage Plant Supervisor Public Safety Positions
Recreation Positions

Associate Park and Recreation Specialist
Park and Recreation Specialist
Pool Lifeguard
Staff Park and Recreation Specialist
Senior Park and Recreation Specialist
Resource Protection Positions

Assistant State Archeologist
Assistant State Park Resource Ecologist
Associate State Archeologist
Associate State Park Resource Ecologist
Engineering Geologist
Environmental Scientist
Forester I
Forester II
Museum Curator I
Museum Curator II
Museum Curator III
Senior Environmental Scientist
Senior Geologist
Senior State Archeologist
Supervising State Park Resource Ecologist
 Featured Links
Becoming a State Employee
Locate a Recruiter
Ranger Cadets
Lifeguard Cadets

 

Judd Smith

13
General Fishing Tips / Re: How do you find Halibut?
« on: June 28, 2009, 09:16:16 AM »
You won't catch Halibut by fishing immediately adjacent to the Berkeley Pier.
I can't catch    a n y t h i n g    in & about the pier & it's structure.
This mystifies me, but......there it is.

When people talk about "fishing" and "berkeley" they seem mostly to mean
the "flats north of Berkeley"....off the racetrack & north.

Judd

14
General Talk / Re: Identify this fish..
« on: June 11, 2009, 02:09:41 PM »
Wow....looks like a chinese screen painting.

Judd

15
Safety First / Re: Theives on the beach
« on: May 29, 2009, 05:15:49 PM »
Police...."authorities"....and "talking heads on TV".....

They're fools....all subscribing to touchy-feeling "modern cant" that has lost sight of that certain knowledge that:  Some things are worth dieing for.

My God, where do people get their logic today...from the fake "scripted" characters on "little-house-on-the prairie?"

Of course...an unarmed man does not got up against a drawn gun
Of course...a single man facing two, weighs self-knowledge carefully.

But if you think it's a "go," you don't abrogate both "right" and "duty" to the nonexistant and absurd back-up and follow-up...of police.

BUT THE CHIEF POINT:   We    h a v e     the hostage-taking situations today exactly    b e c a u s e    weak people subscribe to the notion that one should concern one's self with "hostage lives" or "the value of an airplane" when dealing with extortion.

Weak people.   Yes police.    Yes politicians.
Weak people.   Yes journalists.    Yes Editorial Writers.

Are you aware
That police departments STAFF "negotiator" job-categories...???...!!!...

HISTORY  TEACHES that extortionist concilliation leads to nothing but more extortion.

Judd

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 27
anything