Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 19, 2024, 06:36:48 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[Today at 05:32:15 PM]

[Today at 04:51:41 PM]

[Today at 04:43:49 PM]

[Today at 03:38:04 PM]

[Today at 02:40:25 PM]

[Today at 12:23:11 PM]

[Today at 10:38:26 AM]

[Today at 08:08:50 AM]

[April 18, 2024, 10:26:01 PM]

[April 18, 2024, 07:53:15 PM]

[April 18, 2024, 02:15:59 PM]

[April 18, 2024, 01:10:11 PM]

[April 18, 2024, 11:10:06 AM]

[April 18, 2024, 09:46:32 AM]

[April 18, 2024, 09:43:09 AM]

[April 18, 2024, 09:32:03 AM]

[April 18, 2024, 06:51:56 AM]

[April 17, 2024, 07:24:10 PM]

[April 17, 2024, 06:09:58 PM]

by Clb
[April 17, 2024, 05:19:05 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 09:41:56 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 05:41:52 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 04:34:12 PM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bsteves

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 141
31
Fish Talk / Re: Fish egg viability?
« on: March 11, 2015, 04:49:10 PM »
I don't believe that to the case in fish.  Their biology is just too different in many ways.  For example, fish have indeterminate growth (i.e. they never stop growing) where as I bet your grandmother is shorter now than she was when she was 25.   

Bigger fish = more eggs and bigger eggs = more fecundity and more viability

In the end a 38# pound fish will produce many more viable offspring than eight 5# fish.  It  might actually take as many as ten to fifteen 5# fish to produce as many viable offspring.

Brian

32
General Talk / 10 year anniversary
« on: January 16, 2015, 10:49:53 AM »
I don't check in often enough to NCKA since moving to Portland, OR awhile ago.  When I did check in today though I noticed that I just missed my 10 year membership anniversary to NCKA a few days ago.   I looked around and couldn't find the "Congratulations NCKA for 10 Awesome Years" post. If anyone has the link to it, let me know. 

In the meantime, I'll just say it again..

Congratulations for 10 amazing years of kayak angling community in Northern California!




33
Safety First / Re: Got Wacked
« on: October 06, 2014, 10:17:30 AM »
While you're waiting for the official word on the length estimate, I took a stab at it based on this paper.

http://astro.temple.edu/~tud02746/publications/Lowry%20et%20al.,%202009.pdf

Everything in the paper is in metric and they provide log-log regression equations for various species of sharks to convert bite size and tooth distance to total shark length.    There are two slightly different equations for GWS depending on whether you are using upper jaw or lower jaw IDD (inter-dental distance), but they are close enough that I only bother with the upper jaw equation.  Solving for x (total length) I came up with the following plot which I converted back to good ol' American imperial units.

Based on this image..


The IDD looks to be about 2 inches even which puts this shark at 21.4 ft long


There is another set of equations in the paper if you happen to have the circumference of the bite.

34
Safety First / Re: Got Wacked
« on: October 03, 2014, 10:50:24 PM »
Here's a paper on determining shark length from bite marks.

http://astro.temple.edu/~tud02746/publications/Lowry%20et%20al.,%202009.pdf

I need to double check my math tomorrow when I'm more awake but I came up with just over 20 ft ( i.e. About as big as they get).

35
Fish Talk / Re: Looking for an ID
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:38:04 PM »
siphonophore

36
Fish Talk / Re: Can anyone ID this fish?
« on: December 09, 2013, 11:07:57 AM »
bigscale logperch

That makes more sense. 

37
Fish Talk / Re: Can anyone ID this fish?
« on: December 09, 2013, 10:03:49 AM »
That's a really bad angle to identify a fish from, but my guess would be that it's a blenny of some sort, probably one of the many small species of kelpfish in the area.  Kelpfish tend to have a small mouth, pointy head and a long body.  If I could see the dorsal and anal fins I could be certain.

Brian

38
Fish Talk / Re: Possible Kelp Greenling?
« on: August 20, 2013, 11:09:32 AM »
That is an Atka mackerel.  You were close to guess greenling, as it is at least in the Hexagrammidae family (along with greenlings and lingcod). 

39
Fish Talk / Re: Government to take out 'vampire fish'
« on: June 04, 2013, 10:05:17 AM »
Oh CNN... the things you will do to grab viewer's attention.  I've never heard lamprey being called "vampire fish".  Lamprey invaded the rest of the Great Lakes from Lake Ontario years ago when the US and Canada made a shipping channel around Niagara Falls.   

Up in on here in Oregon, lamprey are actually in trouble and they are taking measures to protect them.

At least it wasn't the Mermaid "documentary" that aired on Animal Planet.

40
Fish Talk / Re: Fresh Water Clams?
« on: May 06, 2013, 12:51:42 PM »
Those are invasive Asian clams ( Corbicula fluminea )
Here's some more information about the species..
http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=92

and here's a recipe from a site dedicated to eating invasive species.
http://invasivore.org/2011/05/recipe-three-cups-corbicula/

Brian

41
For Sale / Re: WTB Ukelele for my daughter
« on: March 07, 2013, 02:51:25 PM »
I would avoid the $20 ukuleles, they never stay in tune.
There are several brands out there that cost between $60 - $300 depending on the wood choice that are actually stay in tune and sound pretty good.  They're all made in china.  If you want "Made in Hawaii" you'll pay $500+.

I'm personally partial to the Kala brand.   I have a low end "Makala" line soprano pinapple uke from Kala and for $50 it's great.

http://kalaukulele.com/index.htm
http://www.amazon.com/Kala-MK-P-Makala-Pineapple-Ukelele/dp/B001LU39F6

When I changed out the factory strings for some Aquila Nylguts it sounded even better..

http://www.amazon.com/Aquila-Nylgut-Soprano-Ukulele-Strings/dp/B003NJF1G8/ref=pd_bxgy_MI_text_y






42
Site Discussion / Re: Starting the AOTY/DOTY server move
« on: March 07, 2013, 02:42:59 PM »
I added Calico's back in as a species that isn't currently in use.  Old records from previous years should show up now but you can't select calico's for a new catch entry this year. 

44
Site Discussion / Re: Starting the AOTY/DOTY server move
« on: March 07, 2013, 01:02:19 PM »
I fixed the URLs in the RSS feeds.

45
Fish Talk / Re: Jacksmelt?
« on: December 07, 2012, 02:12:17 PM »
Yep, that's a jacksmelt.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 141
anything