Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 18, 2024, 08:35:25 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[Today at 07:53:15 PM]

[Today at 06:54:40 PM]

by jp52
[Today at 02:25:47 PM]

[Today at 02:15:59 PM]

[Today at 01:10:11 PM]

[Today at 11:10:06 AM]

[Today at 09:46:32 AM]

[Today at 09:43:09 AM]

[Today at 09:32:03 AM]

[Today at 06:51:56 AM]

[April 17, 2024, 10:47:56 PM]

[April 17, 2024, 10:07:55 PM]

[April 17, 2024, 07:24:10 PM]

[April 17, 2024, 06:09:58 PM]

by Clb
[April 17, 2024, 05:19:05 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 09:41:56 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 05:41:52 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 04:34:12 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 04:12:33 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 03:10:47 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 02:05:51 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 01:19:27 PM]

[April 16, 2024, 09:43:54 AM]

[April 16, 2024, 09:22:18 AM]

[April 16, 2024, 12:32:58 AM]

[April 15, 2024, 10:38:53 PM]

[April 15, 2024, 10:28:01 PM]

Support NCKA

Support the site by making a donation.

Topic: Factory Roof Rack ... Fail!  (Read 5550 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • View Profile Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13078
Factory Roof Rack ... Fail!

Yup, we busted a factory rook rack on our recent Kodiak trip.

http://www.kayakfishingmagazine.net/gear-guide/91-new-kayak-gear/1964-factory-roof-rack-fail.html

-Allen


G-Whiz

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • I'm Glen, from the mailroom!
  • View Profile
  • Date Registered: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 5033
Those were not designed as load-bearing cross bars; they were more for prevent the load from shifting forward/backward on top the vehicle...
The one who dies with the most toys, WINS!



polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • View Profile Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13078
Those were not designed as load-bearing cross bars; they were more for prevent the load from shifting forward/backward on top the vehicle...

No shit.   :smt006

-Allen


G-Whiz

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • I'm Glen, from the mailroom!
  • View Profile
  • Date Registered: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 5033
Those were not designed as load-bearing cross bars; they were more for prevent the load from shifting forward/backward on top the vehicle...

No shit.   :smt006

-Allen

 :smt044

The one who dies with the most toys, WINS!



Hojoman

  • Manatee
  • *****
  • View Profile
  • Location: Fremont, CA
  • Date Registered: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 32200
Any damage to the roof?


otobepelagic

  • o2b
  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
  • View Profile
  • Location: cotati
  • Date Registered: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 3665
Hopefully better than this guy...
NCKA Angler of the Year 2010 1st Place, 2009 2nd Place, 2008 3rd Place          


Living the dream before I can only dream of it.......


polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • View Profile Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13078
Any damage to the roof?

Other than the rack, I don't think so.  It sort of just settled in.  We heard it when it buster, although didn't realize it at the time.  Circled back to see what fell off, at at that point, noticed the break.

-Allen


bmb

  • Please unsubscribe me from the
  • AOTY Committee
  • *
  • View Profile
  • Location: Livermoron
  • Date Registered: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 7306
My original one on the Subaru bent too. Went to aftermarket and never looked back.


SOMA

  • Salmon
  • ***
  • View Profile
  • Location: Chico
  • Date Registered: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 985
Those were not designed as load-bearing cross bars; they were more for prevent the load from shifting forward/backward on top the vehicle...

No shit.   :smt006

-Allen

 :smt044

Me too!


FishingForTheCure

  • "I'm going to make dinner because my colors taste like hungry"
  • Manatee
  • *****
  • LOWRANCE & SIMRAD PRO STAFF
  • View Profile
  • Location: Aromas
  • Date Registered: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 11334
Somehow I thought that the max working load for a set of factory cross bars is like 150#.  I bet the two yaks had a little something to do with that. :smt003


G-Whiz

  • Sea Lion
  • ****
  • I'm Glen, from the mailroom!
  • View Profile
  • Date Registered: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 5033
Somehow I thought that the max working load for a set of factory cross bars is like 150#.  I bet the two yaks had a little something to do with that. :smt003

Some can, but most are not designed too...  It's not only the actual weight of the object, but also the amount of force/pressure that the wind puts on the bars; both downward and upwards....
The one who dies with the most toys, WINS!



polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • View Profile Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13078
Somehow I thought that the max working load for a set of factory cross bars is like 150#.  I bet the two yaks had a little something to do with that. :smt003

I think for this particular rack, the max spec is more like 100#.  Yes, we exceeded it.

-Allen


FishingForTheCure

  • "I'm going to make dinner because my colors taste like hungry"
  • Manatee
  • *****
  • LOWRANCE & SIMRAD PRO STAFF
  • View Profile
  • Location: Aromas
  • Date Registered: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 11334
We did some extensive testing of roof racks for a company at the last engineering firm I worked for.  The assembly bolted to it was only like 20# but on a bumpy road, windage, etc. it exceeded the operating strength of factory AND aftermarket racks when put into "testing" mode with g-force, etc....  The aftermarket rack companies, per calls to them, stated no higher than 150# but wouldn't expand if that was static weight or ????


Kardinal_84

  • Sand Dab
  • **
  • View Profile Alaska Kayak Fisher
  • Location: Anchorage, AK
  • Date Registered: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 60
The residual damage. Just the paint. Better order the other foot. Argh... 
AlaskaKayakFisher.com   
guidesak.blogspot.com    My personal blogs...No, I am not a guide....


polepole

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • View Profile Kayak Fishing Magazine
  • Location: San Jose, CA
  • Date Registered: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 13078
The residual damage. Just the paint. Better order the other foot. Argh... 

And that likely happened because we left it as is, other than moving the other factory rack forward and re-securing the kayaks.  The  broken rack just rubbed on the roof as we continued down the road!

-Allen


 

anything